S3U

Reading / Media literacy / Grade 7 / re7v2

Visual Evidence: A Plan Is Not a Completion Record

Read a map key and its coverage before describing what was built or opened.

All worksheets

Watch the lesson | Compare more records in Source Desk

5 questions0m 0s
Learn the skill

Use this map's own key, not a symbol meaning remembered from another map. Distinguish existing structures, proposed structures and operating access. Read the title, date, purpose and coverage. A plan can include existing places without proving that every proposed change was completed.

Worked example

A harbor plan uses a filled square for one existing pier and a hollow square for a proposed pier. A dashed crossing means a proposed ferry route. The two squares do not prove two completed piers or a running ferry service. A later inspection could help check what was actually completed.

North Path proposal dated 1940, not to scale. Filled diamonds at A, B and C mean existing shelters. Hollow diamonds at D and E mean proposed shelters. The connecting dashed line is a proposed footpath. Only places on this proposal are shown.
Question record: the North Path plan, not the worked-example harbor. A proposal is not confirmation of opening.

The fictional North Path proposal

A park planner drew this North Path proposal in 1940. Filled diamonds mark existing shelters A, B and C. Hollow diamonds mark proposed shelters D and E. The dashed line means a proposed footpath, not confirmed open access. This diagram is not to scale and includes only places along this proposal, not every park shelter. No completion or opening record is supplied. A later newsletter claims that all five shelters and the path were open in 1940, using only this plan as its source.

Question 1 How many shelters does this diagram mark as existing?
Question 2 What do the two hollow diamonds mean according to this key?
Question 3 What does the connecting dashed line establish here?
Question 4 Does this plan establish the total number of existing shelters in the entire park?
Question 5 What evidence would most directly help check the newsletter's 1940 opening claim?